Progressive Collapse analysis of Dual System “Special Moment Steel Frame with Special Concrete Shear Wall”

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 civil engineering, Kharazmi University, Tehran,Iran

2 Imam Hossein University

Abstract

One of the approaches to passive defense is to protect important buildings against progressive collapse. Progressive collapse is a phenomenon that happens in a building due to the removal of some structural members. In this research, the progressive collapse of a 26 story residential building in Tehran was studied by the alternative load path (ALP) method according to UFC 4-023-03. Several independent column and shear wall removal scenarios were adopted from the first floor. Nonlinear dynamic analysis was performed with SAP2000 software according to UFC to evaluate the bridging ability of the building on the remained members. Plastic joints in beams and columns were defined in special moment frames according to the instructions ASCE41-17 and FEMA356. Also, the shear walls were modeled by the multi-layer shells method and the mid column equivalent method. The results showed that correct relocation of the shear walls in a dual system within building guidelines leads to appropriate resistance to progressive collapse.

Keywords

References

[1]     Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center (BHRC), “Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistance Desighn of Buildings,” Standard No. 2800, 4th Edition, 2015. (In Persian)##
[2]     Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center (BHRC), “Passive Defense,” 21th Section, 2017. (In Persian)##
[3]     S. Sh. Emamzadeh and A. Heravi, “Retrofitting of Masonry Walls with Reinforced Shotcrete under Blast Load,” Passive Defense Quarterly, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 61-72, Summer 2019. (In Persian)##
[4]     A. Esmaeli and S. Sh. Emamzadeh, “The Study of CFRP Sheet Arrangement in Reinforcing Unarmed Masonry Walls Against Blast Load,” Passive Defense Quarterly, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1-7, Summer 2015. (In Persian).##
[5]     J. Kim and T. Kim, “Assessment of Progressive Collapse-Resisting Capacity of Steel Moment Frames,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, no. 65, pp. 169-179, 2009.##
[6]     T. Kim, J. Kim, and J. Park, “Investigation of Progressive Collapse-Resisting Capability of Steel Moment Frames Using Push-Down Analysis,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, vo1. 23, no. 5, pp. 327-335, 2009.##
[7]     Sh. Jalili gheshlagh, M. Sheydaee, and R. Bahraminejad, “Progressive Collapse analysis in Steel Frames Equipped with Steel Shear Walls,” Third National Conference on Structural and Steel, 2012.##
[8]     Y. Fahjan, J. Kubin, and M. Tan, “Nonlinear Analysis Methods for Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Shear Walls,” 14th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2010.##
 [9]     GSA, “Alternate Path Analysis and Design Guidelines for Progressive Collapse Resistance,” US General Service Administration, 2016.##
[10]  Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), “Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse,” Department of Defense, Change 3, 2016.##
[11]  A. McKay-Matt and G. Marchand, “Non-Linear Dynamic Alternate Path Analysis for Progressive Collapse: Detailed Procedures Using UFC 4-023-03,” 2009.##
[12]  ASCE 41-17, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings,” American Society of Civil Engineer, 2017.##
[13]  FEMA 356, “Prestandard And Commentary for The Sesmic Rehabilitation of Buildings,” Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.##
[14]  R. Park, “Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete,” ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 114(8), pp. 1804-1825, 1988.##

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 February 2020
  • Revise Date: 29 April 2020
  • Accept Date: 15 August 2020
  • Publish Date: 21 November 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics