The Evaluation of Progressive Collapse in the Space-Structure with the Scenario of Simultaneous Removal of a Column and Brace (Case Study: Wind Tunnel Retaining Structure)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 گروه عمران.دانشکده فنی مهندسی.دانشاه آزاد اسلامی علوم و تحقیقات قشم.قشم.ایران

2 NEZAJA Research Organization

Abstract

Progressive collapse is defined as the propagation of some primary local failure from one member to another that eventually leads to the failure of the entire structure or a large part of it. Potential hazards or incidents that can result in progressive damage include fire, collision, explosion, and earthquake. In the mechanism of progressive collapse, a local failure, such as the major damage or removal of a column, causes a total and significant collapse that will lead to the collapse of the entire structure. The aim of the present study is to investigate the progressive collapse in a special braced wind tunnel retaining structure with the scenario of simultaneously removing one of the main columns and bracings in the base level. In this study, a wind tunnel retaining space structure that supports the main structure of the wind tunnel is considered. This high-rise steel structure is braced with a composite structural system, which incorporates various failure scenarios. The models are first analyzed and designed in ETABS software and their output is transferred in SAP2000 software and then nonlinear static analysis is performed on those models. The results show that in case of the removal of bracing in the event of an explosion, only in members close to the removed elements, an increase in shear is observed. The amount of displacement of the structure in nonlinear static analysis is equivalent to removing one column and bracing more than the previous case. The results show that by removing the column and bracing simultaneously, the progressive collapse will probably mostly occur in elements close to the part to which the failure scenario is applied.

Keywords


Smiley face

  • [1] R. Ellingwood, R. Smilowitz, D. O. Dusenberry, D. Duthinh, H. S. Lew, and N. J. Carino, “Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings,” U.S. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. (NIST)., 2007.##
  • [2] ASCE, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-16). 2016.##
  • [3] Rezakhani, “Evaluation of the progressive collapse in steel buildings,” 1st ed. Tehran: Pooneh Pub., 2020.##
  • [4] Eidi and S. Gholizadehfard, “Progressive collapse of steel structures and exploring the causes of the Plasco’s building collapse,” in 4th national conference of civil engineering and architecture, K. N. Toosi University, 2017.##
  • [5] Rahnavard, F. F. Z. Fard, A. Hosseini, and M. Suleiman, “Nonlinear analysis on progressive collapse of tall steel composite buildings,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 8, pp. 359–379, 2018.##
  • [6] Badrloo, “Study of Progressive Collapse in Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Resisting Frames Due to the Sudden Removal of Columns,” Sci. J. Passiv. Def., no. 3, pp. 21–33, 2018.##
  • [7] S. Hashemi, S. Javidi, H. Farhadi, and A. Fiouz, “Evaluation the Progressive Collapse of Steel Structures with Beam to Column-Tree Connections,” Passiv. Def. Q., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2019.##
  • [8] Emmamzadeh and A. Arbab NoushAbadi, “Progressive Collapse Analysis of Dual System Special Moment Steel Frame with Special Concrete Shear Wall,” Passiv. Def. Q., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 67–78, 2020.##
  • [9] L. Li, G. Q. Li, B. Jiang, and Y. Lu, “Analysis of robustness of steel frames against progressive collapse,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 143, 2018.##
  • Marjanishvili and E. Agenew, “Comparison of various procedures for progressive collapse analysis,” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 365–374, 2006.##
  • Fu, “Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise buildings with 3D finite element method modeling,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 65, pp. 1222–1262, 2002.##
  • “Progressive collapse analysis and design guideline for new federal office buildings and major modernization,” Washington D.C., 2003.##
  • “Design of building to resist progressive collapse,” 2013.##
  • Khandelwal, S. El-Tawil, and F. Sadek, “Progressive collapse analysis of seismically designed steel braced frames,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 65, no. 3, 2009.##
  • -X. Fang, “Discussion of ‘Practical Means for Energy-Based Analyses of Disproportionate Collapse Potential’ by Donald O. Dusenberry and Ronald O. Hamburger,” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., vol. 21, no. 5, 2007.##
  • Kim and J. Kim, “Collapse analysis of steel moment frames with various seismic connections,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 65, no. 6, 2009.##
  • Molaei and A. Pakzad, “Effect of Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete Column Retrofitted with Steel Jacket Exposed to Explosion,” Passiv. Def. Q., vol. 42, pp. 73–81, 2020.##
  • FEMA 356, “FEMA 356 - Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings , Federal Emergency Management Agency,” Rep. FEMA-356, Washington, DC, 2000.##
  • Receive Date: 19 December 2020
  • Revise Date: 28 August 2021
  • Accept Date: 05 September 2021
  • Publish Date: 22 November 2021