Passive Defense

Passive Defense

Assessment of the Vulnerability Status of Urban Infrastructure from the Perspective of Passive Defense (Case Study: Ilam City)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Postdoctoral Researcher in Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
3 Associate Professore of political Geography, Imam Hossein Comprehensive University, Tehran, Iran.
4 PhD, Payam Noor University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Today, the concentration of population, infrastructure, and vital land uses in cities has rendered them highly vulnerable to both human-induced threats and natural hazards. In border cities, this issue assumes greater importance due to their geopolitical status, connective functions, and the concentration of administrative and service centers. As a frontier city and the primary transit gateway for pilgrims to the holy shrines, Ilam encompasses a dense cluster of vital, sensitive, and critical land uses, thereby necessitating a precise assessment of its spatial vulnerability and the adoption of planning strategies grounded in the principles of passive defense. In this context, identifying high­risk zones and prioritizing vulnerable elements constitutes a fundamental step toward mitigating potential damages and enhancing urban resilience. The present study was conducted to assess and zone the vulnerability of urban infrastructures and land uses in Ilam from a passive defense perspective. Adopting a descriptive-analytical research design, data were collected through documentary studies and field surveys, including expert interviews and questionnaire administration. A total of 30 indicators associated with vulnerable urban elements were identified. Following the weighting of these indicators using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), the corresponding spatial layers were prepared and analyzed within a Geographic Information System (GIS) environment. Ultimately, the final vulnerability zoning map of the city was derived through an integrated overlay analysis of the layers. The findings reveal that the central and northwestern sectors of the city are classified within high and very high vulnerability categories, primarily attributable to elevated population density, the overconcentration of critical and sensitive land uses, and inadequate spatial distribution of services. Overall, approximately 52% of the city's total area falls within high and very high vulnerability zones, 12% is situated in moderate vulnerability zones, and 36% lies within low-risk zones. Furthermore, healthcare facilities, administrative­managerial land uses, and communication networks were identified as the most critical elements, carrying the highest vulnerability weights. Accordingly, the study proposes a set of strategic measures, including the balanced spatial redistribution of vital land uses, reduction of functional concentration, reinforcement of supportive infrastructures, and the systematic integration of passive defense requirements into future urban development plans.




Keywords

[1] G. Zarei and S. Abazarloo, “Assessment of urban vulnerability using AHP with passive defense approach: Case study of Tehran,” Safe City J., vol. 1, no. 2, 2018. (In Persian) https://www.ispdrc.ir/article_705603.html
[2] S. A. Hosseini et al., “Assessment of vulnerable elements and passive defense considerations in Tehran buffer zone,” in Proc. 1st Conf. Urban Planning with Passive Defense Approach, Malek Ashtar Univ., 2011. (In Persian)
[3] B. Wisner et al., “Proactive approach to disaster reduction,” Feinstein Int. Famine Center Report, Kobe Conf., Japan, 2005.
[4] M. M. Azizi and M. Bornafar, “Optimal urban planning during air attacks from passive defense perspective,” Urban Stud. Q., no. 1, pp. 9–22, 2012. (In Persian) https://urbstudies.uok.ac.ir/article_1271.html
[5] A. Shahi Vandi and H. Sheikhi, “Evaluation of urban vulnerability based on passive defense principles: Case study of Hamedan,” J. Phys. Dev. Plan., no. 4, pp. 81–92, 2018. (In Persian)
[6] G. Siyami et al., “Defensive pathology of urban structure using AHP and GIS: Case study of Gorgan,” Geogr. Spat. Plan., vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 21–42, 2013. (In Persian) https://gps.gu.ac.ir/article_7382.html
[7] H. Kamran and H. Hosseini Amini, “Application of passive defense in urban and regional planning: Case study of Shahriar,” Geogr. Space, vol. 12, no. 38, pp. 215–237, 2012. (In Persian)
[8] P. Brandon, “Extreme management in disaster recovery,” Procedia Eng., vol. 14, pp. 14–21, 2011.
[9] M. Ghazanfari, Vulnerability Assessment of Metro Stations Against Man-Made Threats, M.S. thesis, Malek Ashtar Univ., 2013. (In Persian)
[10] H. Moradi, “Evaluation of urban land uses with passive defense approach: Case study of Ilam,” Applied Research Report, Law Enforcement Research Office, Ilam, 2024. (In Persian)
[11] H. Moradi and S. Maleki, “Evaluation of passive defense principles in urban water infrastructures of Ilam,” J. Passive Defense, in press, 2025.
[12] J. Sadidi et al., “Assessment of residential land-use vulnerability against external threats: Case study of Tehran District 10,” J. Spat. Anal. Environ. Hazards, vol. 10, no. 3, 2023. (In Persian) https://www.sid.ir/paper/1494892/fa
[13] M. Dehghan et al., “Evaluation of urban land uses with passive defense approach,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz, 2022. (In Persian)
[14] Z. Salahshour et al., “Assessment of urban infrastructure vulnerability with passive defense approach: Case study of Shirvan,” Geogr. Q., vol. 20, no. 72, 2022. (In Persian)
[15] M. Kadkhodaei et al., “Urban spatial planning with passive defense approach in Zahedan,” Peri-Urban Space Dev., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 67–90, 2021. (In Persian)
[16] M. Gholamzadeh Sistani, The Role of Passive Defense in Urban Construction Management (Case Study: Shiraz) , M.S. thesis, Dept. Civil Eng., Allameh Mohaddeseh Noori Univ., 2021. (In Persian)
[17] H.-M. Lyu and Z.-Y. Yin, “An improved MCDM combined with GIS for risk assessment of multi-hazards in Hong Kong,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 93, p. 104427, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scs.2023.104427
[18]  A. Jamali, M. Robati, H. Nikoomaram, F. Farsad, and H. Aghamohammadi, “Urban resilience assessment using hybrid MCDM model based on DEMATEL–ANP method (DANP),” J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 893–915, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-023-01670-8.
[19] I. Pal et al., Science and Technology for Multi-Hazard Vulnerability, Climate Change and Resilience Building, vol. 1, 2022.
[20] M. Pourmohammadi, H. Ahmadi, and A. Salaripour, “Developing physical resilience strategies in passive defense according to identification of endangered areas of urban environments: Case study of Ahvaz,” Int. J. Disaster Resil. Built Environ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 14–30, 2022.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-08-2020-0086
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[21] F. Moraci et al., “Making less vulnerable cities: Resilience as a new paradigm of smart planning,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 755, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390 /su10030755
[22] P. Yadollahi et al., “Managerial strategies for reducing flood hazard consequences using SWOT: Case study of Hamedan–Bahar Plain,” J. Watershed Manag. Res., vol. 11, no. 22, pp. 188–198, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jwmr.11.22.188
[23] M. R. Narimisa, N. E. A. Basri, and M. Elahi, “Passive defense: Measuring and evaluating urban vulnerability with resilience approach,” Religación, vol. 4, no. 13, pp. 153–160, 2019.
[24] Deputy of Planning, Ilam Governorate, Statistical Yearbook of Ilam Province, 2021. (In Persian).
[25] Naqsh-e Jahan Pars Consulting Engineers, Detailed Plan of Tehran Region 6, 2007. (In Persian)
[26] M. H. Yazdani and A. Seydin, “Urban vulnerability assessment from passive defense perspective: Case study of Ardabil,” Sepehr Geogr. Inf. Q., vol. 25, no. 100, pp. 18–22, 2016. (In Persian)
Volume 17, Issue 2 - Serial Number 66
Serial number 66. Summer 2026
Summer 2026
Pages 127-144

  • Receive Date 24 December 2025
  • Revise Date 07 February 2026
  • Accept Date 13 July 2026
  • Publish Date 23 July 2026