شناسایی اهداف کوچک مقیاس مدفون درنزدیک سطح زمین با استفاده از روش مغناطیسی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه جامع امام حسین(ع)

2 دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

روش‏ مغناطیسی با استفاده از اندازه­گیری خاصیت مغناطیسی مواد برای شناسایی اهداف و سازه‏های مدفون کاربردهای گسترده­ای دارد. هدف این تحقیق بررسی شناسایی اهداف مدفون کوچک مقیاس نظیر مین­های واقع در نزدیک سطح زمین از طریق شبیه‏سازی و مدل‏سازی ساختار­های مغناطیسی است. به این منظور، با کمک نرم‌افزار ژئوسافت، روش­ سیگنال تحلیلی و بلیکلی بر روی بر روی 20 هدف شبیه­ سازی شده از طریق نرم­افزار مدل ویژن اعمال گردیده است. همچنین با استفاده از فیلتر مشتق افقی امکان شناسایی بی‏ هنجاری‏های مغناطیسی اهداف بررسی و تحلیل شده است. نتایج به‌دست‌آمده در این تحقیق نشان می­دهد که بر اساس استفاده از روش‏ها و فیلترهای مناسب، روش مغناطیسی­ در شناسایی اهداف کوچک مقیاس مدفون در عمق‌های نزدیک­ به سطح زمین دارایی توانایی نسبتاً خوبی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

-

  1. K. K. Sharma, “Geological evolution and crustal growth of the Bundelkh and carton and its relict in the surrounding regions, North Indian Shield,” The Indian Precambrian, Scientific Publshers, India, pp. 33-43, 1998.
  2. M. Metwaly, “Detection of metallic and plastic landmines using the GPR and 2-D resistivity techniques,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 7, pp. 755–763, 2007.
  3. D. Potin, E. Duflos, and P. Vanheeghe, “A Survey of Current Sensor Technology Research for the Detection of Landmines, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 2399-2410, 2009.
  4. K. C. Ho, P. D. Gader, and J. N. Wilson, “Improving landmine detection using frequency domain features form ground penetrating radar,” In Proc. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp., vol. 3, pp. 1617–1620, 2004.
  5. M. A. Gonzalez-Huici, “Accurate ground penetrating radar numerical modeling for automatic detection and recognition of antipersonnel landmines,” Mathematisch-Naturwissen schaftliche Fakultät, Univ. Bonn, 2013.
  6. M. A. Abbas and A. Lethy, “Implementation of wave-let correlation to locate landmine-like objects using GPR Data as experimented on a test site,” Journal of Suez Canal University, pp. 83–97, 2005.
  7. O. Lopera and N. Milisavljevic, “Prediction of the effects of soil and target properties on the antipersonnel landmine detection performance of ground-penetrating radar: A Colombian case study,” J. Appl. Geophys., vol. 63, pp. 13–23, 2007.
  8. C. Lee, “Mine detection techniques using multiple sensors,” M. S. thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 2001.
  9. C. Bruschini and B. Gros, “A Survey of Current Sensor Technology Research for the Detection of Landmines,” In Proc. of the International Workshop on Sustainable Humanitarian Demining, vol. 6, pp. 18-27, 1997.
  10. A. N. Kalagar, A. Mahzoon, M. R. Hedayati, and M. R. Rad, “Landmine Detection by Passive Infrared Thermography Using Image Processing Techniques,” vol. 4, pp. 153-202, 2012.
  11. J. K. Paik, C. P. Lee, and A. Abidi, “Image processing based mine detection techniques using multiple sensors: A review,” Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications, An International Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 153-202, 2002.
  12. P. Church, J. E. McFee, S. Gagnon, and P. Wort, “Electrical impedance tomographic imaging of buried landmines, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote,” vol. 44, pp. 2407–2420, 2006.
  13. G. El-Qady and K. Ushijima, “Detection of UXO and landmines using 2-D modeling of geoelectrical resistivity data,” In Proc. of SAGEEP Meeting, pp. 1176–1182, 2005.
  14. J. Igel, H. Preetz, and S. Altfelder, “Magnetic viscosity of tropical soils: classification and prediction as an aid for landmine detection,” Geophys J. Int., vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 843-855, 2012.
  15. H. Preetz and V. Hennings, “Predicting metal detector performance for landmine clearance-soil magnetic map of Angola, Environ,” Earth Sci., vol. 60, pp. 1499–1508, 2010.
  16. J. A. Hannam and J. A. Dearing, “Mapping soil magnetic properties in Bosnia and Herzegovina for landmine clearance operations,” Earth planet Sci. Lett., vol. 274, no. 4, pp. 285–294, 2010.
  17. J. Igel and H. Preetz, “Small-scale variability of electromagnetic soil properties and their influence on landmine detection: how to measure, how to analyze and how to interpret?,” In Proc. of Detection and Sensing of Mines, Explosive Objects, and Obscured Tar, 2009.
  18. F. Liming, K. Chong, Z. Xiaojun, Z. Quan, and W. Ming, “An efficient method for tracking a magnetic target using scalar magnetometer array,” Springerplus, vol. 5, no. 202, 2016.
  19. M. P. Bray and C. A. Link, “Learning Machine Identification of Ferromagnetic UXO Using Magnetometry,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 8, no. 2, 2015.
  20. E. Robinson and C. Coruh, “Basic exploration Geophysics,” John Wily & Sons, 1988.
  21. V. J. S. Grauch and C. S. Johnston, “Gradient window method: A simple way to isolate regional from local horizontal gradients in potential-field gridded data,” 72nd Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2002.
  22. J. R. Blakely and R. W. Simpson, “Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies,” Geophysics, vol. 51, pp. 1494-1498, 1986.
  23. H. J. Arkani, “Differential reduction to the pole of regional magnetic anomalies,” Geophysics, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1592-1600, 1988.
  24. G., Cooper and D., Cowan, "The application of fractional calculus to potential field data," Exploration Geophysics, vol. 34, pp. 51–56, 2003.
  25. R. J. Blakely, "Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Application," Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 1996.
  26. A. E. Beck, "Physical principles of Exploration Methods," Macmillan press, London, 1981.
  27. R. J. Blakely, "Potential Theory in Gravityand Magnetic Applications," Cambridge University press, New York, 1995.
  28. M. N. Nabighian, "The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation", Geophysics, vol. 37(3), pp. 507-517, 1972.