ارزیابی سریع خطر ساختمان مبتنی بر روش IRVS - مطالعه موردی خوابگاه دانشجویی

فیاض, محمد; حسینی, میلاد; دهقان نژاد ثانی آبادی, مهدی

ارزیابی سریع خطر ساختمان مبتنی بر روش IRVS - مطالعه موردی خوابگاه دانشجویی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ استادیار، دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران

² پژوهشگر، دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران

³ دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکدة مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه ایوانکی‌، ایوانک، ایران

چکیده

زلزله در بسیاری از نقاط جهان سبب ریزش ساختمان‌ها و بروز آسیب‌ها و ایجاد مخاطرات ناشی از آن می‌گردد؛ بنابراین لازم است ساختمان‌ها مورد ارزیابی خطر قرار گرفته و در صورت نیاز، بهسازی یا مقاوم‌سازی آنها در دستور کار قرار گیرد. علاوه بر زلزله، خطرات طبیعی دیگری مانند سیل و طوفان، و همچنین خطرات غیرطبیعی مانند انفجار، حملات شیمیایی و آتش‌سوزی نیز ممکن است یک ساختمان را تهدید کنند؛ پس لازم است که تمام جنبه‌های مختلف آسیب‌پذیری ساختمان در ارزیابی خطر آن در نظر گرفته شود. ارزیابی سازه‌ها به دو روش سریع (کیفی) و کمی (تحلیلی) انجام می‌شود. در روش‌های ارزیابی کیفی، در مدت‌زمان کوتاهی ساختمان‌ها مورد ارزیابی سریع قرار گرفته و به لحاظ آسیب‌پذیری طبقه‌بندی شوند. در این تحقیق انواع روش‌های سریع محاسبه خطر مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. روش ارزیابی جامع چشمی سریع (IRVS)[1] که توانایی محاسبه ریسک و تاب‌آوری برای انواع تهدیدات انسان‌ساز و خطرات طبیعی را دارد برای شرایط داخلی کشور توسعه داده شده است. همچنین این قابلیت را دارد که با توجه به خطر موردنظر کاربر، گزینه‌هایی را برای کاهش خطرارائه دهد که نتایج آن در خصوص یک خوابگاه دانشجویی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفته است.

[1]Intergrated Rapid Visual Screening

کلیدواژه‌ها

20.1001.1.20086849.1403.15.2.2.1

عنوان مقاله [English]

Rapid Assessment of Building Risk Based on the IRVS Method - A Case Study of a Student Dormitory

نویسندگان [English]

Mohammad Fayyaz ¹
Milad Hossseyni ²
Mahdi DehghanNejad ³

¹ Engineering Faculty - Ihu

² Ihu- Civil Engineering Department

³ Ivanki University, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Earthquakes in many parts of the world cause the collapse of buildings and the occurrence of damages and the resulting dangers; Therefore, it is necessary to assess the risk of the buildings and, if necessary, improve or retrofit them. In addition to earthquakes, other natural hazards such as floods and storms, as well as unnatural hazards such as explosions, chemical attacks, and fires may also threaten a building; Therefore, it is necessary to consider all the different aspects of the building's vulnerability in its risk assessment. Evaluation of structures is done in two fast (qualitative) and quantitative (analytical) methods. In qualitative evaluation methods, in a short period of time, buildings are quickly evaluated and classified in terms of vulnerability. In this research, a variety of quick risk calculation methods have been investigated. The integrated rapid visual survey IRVS method, which has the ability to calculate risk and resilience for all types of man-made threats and natural hazards, has been developed for the domestic conditions of the country, and its Persian software is written using the Python programming language. Read Excel. It also has the ability to offer options to reduce risk according to the user's desired risk.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Seismic Risk
Resilience
Seismic Vulnerability
Rapid Seismic Assessment Methods

مراجع

Ainuddin and J. K. Routray, “Community resilience framework for an earthquake prone area in Baluchistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,” vol. 2, pp. 25-36, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.07.003
S. Mayunga, “Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: a capital-based approach,” Summer academy for social vulnerability and resilience building, vol. 1(1), pp. 1-16, 2007.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
Lantada, L. G. Pujades, and A. H. Barbat, “Vulnerability index and capacity spectrum based methods for urban seismic risk evaluation” A comparison. Natural hazards, 51, 501-524, 2009. DOI:10.1007/s11069-007-9212-4
V. Whitman “SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS FOR TWO“SITES CASE, 1975.
A. Page, W. B. Joyner, J. A. Blume“ Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures“Science, vol. 189(4203), pp. 601-608 , 1975. DOI: 10.1126/science.189.4203.601
J. Park, A. S. Ang, and Y. K. Wen “Seismic damage analysis and damage-limiting design of RC buildings“Civil Engineering Studies SRS-516,1984. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14124
M. Calvi, R. Pinho, G. Magenes, J. J. Bommer, L. F. Restrepo-Vélez, and H. Crowley “Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years“ISET journal of Earthquake Technology, vol. 43(3), pp. 75-104, 2006. DOI: 10.4236/ojer.2012.11001
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), “Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: A handbook (FEMA 154).” Government Printing Office Washington, DC, 2015.
D. Jury, “Earthquake Risk Buildings--NZSEE Study Group Recommendations,” 2006
Sinha and A. Goyal, “A national policy for seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings and procedure for rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic vulnerability,” Rep. to Disaster Manag. Div. Minist. Home Aff. Gov. India, Hindistan,2004.https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11100485
Institute for Research in Construction (Canada), Manual for Screening of Buildings for Seismic Investigation. National Research Council of Canada, 1993.
H. Hazus, “Earthquake loss estimation methodology—technical and user manuals,” Fed. Emerg. Manag. Agency, Washingt,1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102676
Federal Emergency Management Agency. Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: Supporting documentation. Government Printing Office, 2015. ISBN0160926750, 9780160926754
U. Khan, M. I. Qureshi, I. A. Rana, and A. Maqsoom, “Seismic vulnerability assessment of building stock of Malakand (Pakistan) using FEMA P-154 method,” SN Appl. Sci., vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 1–14,2019. ISSN :2366-2557
R. Sadat, M. S. Huq, and M. A. Ansary, “Seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings of Dhaka city,” J. Civ. Eng., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 159–172,2010. Issue: 1, 285 - 294, 30.04.2018
M. Kassem, S. Beddu, J. H.Ooi, C. G. Tan, A. Mohamad El-Maissi, and F. Mohamed Nazri “Assessment of seismic building vulnerability using rapid visual screening method through web-based application for Malaysia“ Buildings, vol. 11(10), p. 485, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11100485
Bureau of Technical Affairs and Development of Standards, "Instructions for Seismic Improvement of Existing Buildings" 2008. (in Persian)
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), (2000), “Commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings,” FEMA-356, Fed. Emerg. Manag. Agency, Washington, DC.
Seminar, C. H. A. R. L. E. S. T. O. N. (1997). NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 273). Building Seismic Safety Council: Washington, DC, USA.
Vathouqifar, M. Firouzbakht, and A. Kalantari, "Development of a rapid method for evaluating existing buildings in Iran", Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Research Journal. ISSN: 1735-1677, 2008. (in Persian)
Yadollahi, A. Adnan, and R. M. Zin, “Seismic vulnerability functional method for rapid visual screening of existing buildings,” Archives of Civil Engineering, pp. 363-377, 2012. journal ISSN : 1230-2945
“BIPS 06/FEMA 426: Reference Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks against Buildings, 2nd Edition | Homeland Security.” 10-Feb-2022.
United States Department of Homeland Security, “National Infrastructure Protection Plan 2009.” Washington DC, 2009.
Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center; Regulations for the design of buildings against earthquakes.